Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of dermatoglyphic methodologies in population studies.

R L Jantz, V P Chopra

    American Journal of Physical Anthropology
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compared dermatoglyphic methods in Indian populations. Palmar variables showed more variation than digital ones, suggesting environmental influences on dermatoglyphics.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Sex differences in radioulnar contrasts of the finger ridge counts across 21 human population samples.

    Annals of human biology·2023
    Same author

    Limb bone allometry in modern Euro-Americans.

    American journal of physical anthropology·2017
    Same author

    Archaeological politics and public interest in paleoamerican studies: lessons from Gordon Creek Woman and Kennewick Man.

    American antiquity·2010
    Same author

    Cranial change in Americans: 1850-1975.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2001
    Same author

    Variation among early North American crania.

    American journal of physical anthropology·2001
    Same author

    Biological affinities between migrant and parental populations of fishermen on the east coast of India.

    Human biology·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Anthropology
    • Human Genetics
    • Dermatoglyphics

    Background:

    • Methodological variations in dermatoglyphics complicate population studies.
    • Dermatoglyphic analysis is crucial for understanding human population diversity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare various dermatoglyphic approaches for population studies.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of different dermatoglyphic variables and classification systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized dermatoglyphic data (ridge-counts, quantitative variables) from four Indian groups.
    • Applied classification systems by Cummins and Midlo, and Penrose and Loesch.
    • Evaluated results against anthropometric and serological data.

    Main Results:

    • No single dermatoglyphic approach proved definitively superior.
    • Palmar variables demonstrated greater intergroup heterogeneity than digital variables.
    • The conventional method of using the larger ridge-count was unsatisfactory; retaining both radial and ulnar counts is recommended.

    Conclusions:

    • Environmental variation likely contributes significantly to intergroup dermatoglyphic differences.
    • Palmar dermatoglyphic variables offer more informative population comparisons than digital ones.
    • Standardization of dermatoglyphic methods is needed for reliable population studies.

    Related Experiment Videos