Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Do rates need standardizing for comparative purposes?

|March 1, 1983

Summary

This study re-examines rate standardization for comparisons. It proposes summarizing comparisons may be more relevant than standardizing rates, offering a new descriptive procedure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The comparability of relative safeties from different studies.

Biometrics·1990

Same author

Pyrimidine and purine activities in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Correlation with histological status and survival.

European journal of cancer & clinical oncology·1984

Same author

Substantive difference and the analysis of histograms from very large samples.

The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society·1979

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Public Health

Background:

Standardizing rates is a common practice for comparing populations.
Current methods focus on comparing summary statistics of rates.
The limitations of direct rate standardization are often encountered.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically re-examine the practice of rate standardization.
To explore alternative approaches for comparative analysis.
To introduce a novel descriptive procedure for summarizing comparisons.

Main Methods:

Review of existing statistical standardization techniques.
Conceptual analysis of rate comparison methodologies.
Development of a descriptive procedure for summarizing comparative data.

Main Results:

Standardization is fundamentally a comparison of summary statistics.
Summarizing comparisons can be more informative than standardizing rates in certain contexts.
A new descriptive procedure for comparative analysis is outlined.

Conclusions:

The utility of rate standardization requires careful consideration.
Alternative methods focusing on summarizing comparisons offer potential advantages.
The proposed descriptive procedure provides a new tool for epidemiological research.

Related Experiment Videos