Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Integration misunderstood.

P L Wachtel

    The British Journal of Clinical Psychology
    |June 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study critically examines critiques of integrating psychodynamic and behavioral perspectives, arguing that some criticisms are limited to specific psychoanalytic versions and do not preclude higher-order synthesis for scientific progress.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Racism, vicious circles, and the psychoanalytic vision.

    Psychoanalytic review·2002
    Same author

    Psychotherapy in the twenty-first century.

    American journal of psychotherapy·2000
    Same author

    Cyclical processes in personality and psychopathology.

    Journal of abnormal psychology·1994
    Same author

    The preoccupation with economic growth: an analysis informed by Horneyan theory.

    American journal of psychoanalysis·1991
    Same author

    On some complexities in the application of conflict theory to psychotherapy.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·1978
    Same author

    Depersonalization: an effort at clarification.

    American journal of psychoanalysis·1978
    Same journal

    Imagery rescripting for generalized anxiety disorder: A case series.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Acceptance and commitment therapy combined with behavioural strategies and self-compassion versus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: Feasibility, acceptability, and randomized pilot.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Resilience as a moderator of the association between emotion regulation difficulties and depressive symptoms in late adolescence and young adulthood.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Predictors of worry-related safety behaviours and avoidance.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    A borderline personality disorder diagnosis may improve clinical psychology trainees' treatment beliefs.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Examining suicide in 'pro-choice suicide' forums: A cyclical model.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Psychotherapy Research

    Background:

    • Critiques of integrating psychodynamic and behavioral perspectives exist.
    • Yates (1983) presented specific criticisms regarding this integration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine Yates's (1983) criticisms.
    • To evaluate the applicability of these criticisms to different psychodynamic models.
    • To address the role of tenacious beliefs in scientific progress.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of existing theoretical arguments.
    • Conceptual examination of psychodynamic and behavioral integration.

    Main Results:

    • Yates's criticisms are primarily applicable to intrapsychic psychoanalysis, not interpersonal psychodynamic perspectives.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Differences between perspectives do not inherently prevent higher-order synthesis.
  • The contention that tenacious beliefs drive scientific progress is challenged.

    • Conclusions:

    • Integration of psychodynamic and behavioral perspectives is possible, particularly with interpersonal models.
    • Yates's arguments do not universally preclude the synthesis of these psychological approaches.
    • Scientific progress relies on empirical evidence rather than solely on tenaciously held beliefs.