Abstract:
This brief paper is intended to amplify three points which are contained in Slade (1982) and Owens & Ashcroft (1982). They are that (i) functional relationships must be demonstrated, not merely claimed; (ii) functional relationships are likely to be complex, and clinicians should be wary of superficial analysis; and (iii) there is a distinction between discriminative stimuli and setting conditions which has important implications for clinical practice.
More Related Videos
09:27Functional Complementation Analysis (FCA): A Laboratory Exercise Designed and Implemented to Supplement the Teaching of Biochemical Pathways
Published on: June 24, 2016
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Network Function of a Circuit
Block Diagram Reduction
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
SFG Algebra
Each node in an SFG corresponds to a variable, and the interactions between nodes are represented by branches with associated gains. When multiple branches lead into a node, the value at that node is the sum of the...
Functionalism
James envisioned psychology's role as...
Introduction to Functions
Types of Functions I
