Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Similarities and differences among the senses.

L E Marks

    The International Journal of Neuroscience
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Exploring sensory substitution reveals functional similarities across senses, but differences are key for effective neural prosthetic devices. Focusing on unique strengths of the substitution modality offers better applications for assistive technologies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The perplexing plurality of psychophysical processes.

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
    Same author

    Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat.

    Behaviour research and therapy·2006
    Same author

    Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

    Physiology & behavior·2004
    Same author

    Chemosensory context effects: role of perceived similarity and neural commonality.

    Chemical senses·2000
    Same author

    Cross-modal interaction between vision and touch: the role of synesthetic correspondence.

    Perception·2000
    Same author

    Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis.

    Perception·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Sensory Perception
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • The human sensory system comprises specialized departments for information processing.
    • Despite specialization, senses exhibit functional similarities at phenomenological, informational, psychophysical, and neurophysiological levels.
    • Understanding these sensory similarities and differences is crucial for developing effective sensory substitution technologies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the similarities and differences across human sensory modalities.
    • To evaluate the implications of these sensory characteristics for the design of neural prosthetic devices and sensory substitution systems.
    • To determine the optimal approach for developing assistive technologies for individuals with sensory impairments.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of sensory functions across different modalities.
    • Examination of similarities at four key levels: phenomenology, information processing, psychophysics, and neurophysiology.
    • Review of existing sensory substitution systems (e.g., Braille, Optacon, Tadoma) and their design principles.

    Main Results:

    • Identified deeper similarities in sensory processing, including synesthetic resemblances (e.g., pitch and brightness) and cross-modal shape identification.
    • Highlighted the skin as a potential model for retinal and cochlear processing.
    • Observed that current successful tactile systems do not rely on direct modality translation, suggesting limitations of superficial similarity mapping.

    Conclusions:

    • While sensory similarities exist, they offer limited direct application for designing effective sensory aids.
    • Focusing on the differences between sensory modalities and leveraging the unique strengths of the substitution modality is a more promising approach.
    • Future sensory substitution devices should be tailored to the specific capabilities of the non-native sensory system for optimal performance.

    Related Experiment Videos