Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Applicant selection procedures: a more objective approach to the interview process.

C P Vojir, R A Bronstein

    Journal of Allied Health
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hispanic versus white, non-Hispanic physician medical practices in Colorado.

    Journal of health care for the poor and underserved·2001
    Same author

    Predicting hospice appropriateness for patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

    Applied nursing research : ANR·2000
    Same author

    Multi-method assessment of access to primary medical care in rural Colorado.

    The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·1999
    Same author

    Testing a model of the nursing assessment of infant pain.

    Clinical nursing research·1999
    Same author

    Symptom management outcomes. Do they reflect variations in care delivery systems?

    Medical care·1997
    Same author

    Multisite clinical research: a challenge for nursing leaders.

    The Journal of nursing administration·1997

    A new objective interview system for the University of Colorado Medical Technology Program improved student selection. This behaviorally anchored instrument enhanced reliability and successfully predicted student success.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Health Professions Education
    • Student Selection

    Background:

    • The University of Colorado Medical Technology Program faced challenges with subjective applicant interviews.
    • The inherent subjectivity of traditional interviews impacted the fairness and reliability of student selection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and implement a more objective interview process for medical technology program applicants.
    • To enhance the reliability and predictive validity of the student selection process.

    Main Methods:

    • A behaviorally anchored rating scale was developed as a measurement instrument.
    • Faculty raters received specific training techniques to improve objectivity and reliability.
    • The new interview system's performance was compared to the previous subjective method.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The new interview system demonstrated measurably better performance than the predecessor.
    • Higher reliability coefficients were achieved with the behaviorally anchored instrument.
    • A significant canonical correlation was found between the interview system and student success variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Careful design and implementation of interview processes can yield objective and reliable results.
    • The objective interview system effectively predicts student success in the Medical Technology Program.
    • The enhanced objectivity and reliability of the interview process support fair and effective student selection.