Receptive-field properties in reptilian optic tectum: some comparisons with mammals

The receptive-field properties of single cells in the optic tectum of Iguana iguana were studied using the same procedures as have been used in this laboratory in studying its mammalian homologue, the superior colliculus. Surprisingly, despite some species-specific characteristics, the range of physiological properties of tectal and superior collicular cells appeared to be strikingly similar. This observation is not consistent with the notion that functional differences between these structures evolved as a consequence of the tremendous elaboration of mammalian neocortex and its involvement in sensory processes. The internal organization of visual tectal receptive fields was observed to be very much like that described in mammals. This included a similar distribution of on-off areas, the presence of both spatial summation and spatial inhibition within the excitatory receptive-field borders, suppressive areas just beyond these borders, and a marked tendency for habituation. In addition, many cells showed distinct directional preferences that were strongly influenced by the velocity of movement through the receptive field. Furthermore, the receptive fields of bimodal and trimodal cells showed topographic correspondences as in mammals, although the sizes of the fields were often large, thereby emphasizing the lack of an exact register between modalities. In contrast to the findings in mammals, however, a preference for stationary over moving stimuli was observed in most neurons, and specializations in iguana tectal cells representing the fovea were noted that have not been described in other species. These foveal specializations include a distinct preference for stationary over moving stimuli, the absence of directional selectivity, and the presence of a majority of cells responding at light onset only. It is suggested that the similarities in the organization and response properties of cells of the optic tectum and superior colliculus reflect the retention of ancestral characteristics through various levels of vertebrate evolution. Furthermore, the subtle species differences in the properties of these cells appear to reflect adaptations to specific ecological pressures rather than general evolutionary trends.