Related Experiment Videos
Are endoscopic changes predictive of histologic esophagitis in children?
The Journal of Pediatrics
|August 1, 1983
Summary
Endoscopic findings alone are insufficient to diagnose pediatric esophagitis. Biopsies are crucial, as 30% of children without visible esophageal abnormalities had esophagitis, highlighting the need for biopsies in suspected cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Histopathology
Background:
- Clinical assessment of esophagitis in children often relies on endoscopic visualization.
- The correlation between visible esophageal mucosal changes during endoscopy and definitive histologic diagnosis of esophagitis is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive value of gross mucosal changes observed during upper endoscopy for diagnosing histologic esophagitis in pediatric patients.
- To determine if endoscopic findings alone are adequate for ruling out esophagitis in children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records for 279 pediatric patients.
- Analysis of data from patients who underwent both upper endoscopy and simultaneous esophageal biopsy.
- Comparison of endoscopic findings with histopathologic results.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion (30%) of pediatric patients with no gross mucosal abnormalities on endoscopy showed evidence of esophagitis on biopsy.
- There was a weak association between the presence of endoscopic findings and the diagnosis of histologic esophagitis.
- Endoscopic evaluation alone demonstrated poor predictive value for histologic esophagitis.
Conclusions:
- Gross esophageal mucosal changes observed during endoscopy are unreliable indicators of histologic esophagitis in children and adolescents.
- Endoscopic evaluation alone is inadequate for diagnosing suspected esophagitis in pediatric patients.
- Esophageal biopsies are essential for accurate diagnosis, even in the absence of visible mucosal abnormalities during endoscopy.