Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Computer methods for the assessment of toxicity.

S Wold, S Hellberg, W J Dunn

Acta Pharmacologica Et Toxicologica

|January 1, 1983

Summary

Predicting chemical biological activity requires mathematical models. Semi-empirical and empirical models correlate chemical structure to measured activity, useful for structurally similar compounds.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Gait with light and heavy fracture bandages on the lower leg.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013

Same author

Interactions between surfactants and silver nanoparticles of varying charge.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2011

Same author

Preliminary results from the Scandinavian multicentre evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity (MEIC).

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010

Same author

Fluoridation of Water Supplies.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010

Same author

Coccygectomy: an effective treatment option for chronic coccydynia: retrospective results in 41 consecutive patients.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2010

Same author

Uranium colloid analysis by single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Talanta·2008

Area of Science:

Computational chemistry
Toxicology
Cheminformatics

Background:

Predicting the biological activity and toxicity of chemical compounds is crucial for drug discovery and safety assessment.
Fundamental models (e.g., ab initio quantum mechanics) are currently insufficient for accurately predicting complex biological phenomena.
Existing approaches rely on empirical and semi-empirical models that link chemical structure to observed biological effects.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss the formulation and applicability of mathematical models for predicting chemical biological activity.
To explore the use of semi-empirical and empirical models in relating chemical structure to biological activity, particularly toxicity.
To present common fallacies in model development and application, along with potential solutions.

Main Methods:

Utilizing semi-empirical and empirical mathematical models that correlate variations in chemical structure with measured biological activity.
Calibrating these models using a training set of structurally similar compounds with known biological activity or toxicity.
Applying the calibrated models to predict the activity of new, structurally related chemical compounds.

Main Results:

Semi-empirical and empirical models offer a practical approach for predicting biological activity when fundamental models are inadequate.
Model performance is dependent on the structural similarity between training set compounds and the compounds being predicted.
Careful formulation and application are necessary to avoid common pitfalls and ensure reliable predictions.

Conclusions:

Mathematical models, particularly semi-empirical and empirical ones, are valuable tools for predicting chemical biological activity and toxicity.
The success of these predictive models hinges on the quality of the training data and the structural relevance of the compounds.
Understanding and addressing common model fallacies are essential for robust structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses.

Related Experiment Videos