Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reviewing birthweight standards.

R A Carr-Hill, C W Pritchard

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    |August 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Updating birthweight standards is crucial for research. Current standards, based on 1960s Aberdeen births, need revision due to population changes, presenting challenges in creating universally applicable birthweight charts.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    What is a nurse? Is there an international consensus?

    International nursing review·2013
    Same author

    Managing immunosuppression in medical patients.

    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005)·2009
    Same author

    The effect of the apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and haplotypes on behavioural and psychological symptoms in probable Alzheimer's disease.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2006
    Same author

    Basing resource allocation formulas on standardised mortality ratios would be wrong.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1998
    Same author

    Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1996
    Same author

    Measurement systems in principle and in practice: the example of nursing workload.

    Journal of advanced nursing·1995
    Same journal

    Livial: an economic appraisal.

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
    Same journal

    Livial: a review of clinical studies.

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
    Same journal

    Place of birth and shoulder dystocia.

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
    Same journal

    The value of the negative predictive values.

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
    Same journal

    Splenectomy during pregnancy: an option in treatment of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
    Same journal

    Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough?

    British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Pediatrics
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Standardization of birthweight for gestational age is essential for clinical and research applications.
    • Current British singleton birthweight standards are based on data from Aberdeen (1948-1964).
    • Significant changes in the Aberdeen birth population necessitate an update to existing standards.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To update existing birthweight for gestational age standards for research purposes.
    • To address the need for current, population-specific birthweight data.
    • To identify challenges in developing updated, universally applicable standards.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of current Aberdeen birth population data.
    • Comparison with historical birthweight data (Thomson et al., 1968).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of factors influencing birthweight standardization (infant sex, maternal height/weight).

    • Main Results:

    • The current Aberdeen birth population differs significantly from the population used for the 1968 standards.
    • Updating birthweight standards presents complex challenges.
    • The development of universally applicable standards is complicated by observed population changes.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing birthweight standards require updating to reflect current obstetric populations.
    • Population-specific data is crucial for accurate birthweight standardization.
    • Further research is needed to overcome challenges in creating updated, widely applicable birthweight standards.