Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISPOT): Quantification of Th-1 Cellular Immune Responses Against Microbial Antigens
Published on: November 23, 2010
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of the antispermatozoal antibodies
An immune-enzymatic method was developed for the determination of antispermatozoal antibodies. Sera of 94 infertile patients were studied with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Twelve patients were positive for antispermatozoal antibodies. Forty-six of these patients were studied also with the gelatin agglutination test (GAT). Eight sera were positive in the ELISA and nine in the GAT. With ELISA, immunoglobulin classes can be demonstrated; in fact, nine of our patients were positive for IgG and three for IgM. In all patients the IgA titer was less than 1:16. In addition, 61 seminal fluid specimens were studied by ELISA, and 7 were positive. The serum and seminal fluid of 12 patients were simultaneously studied. Seminal fluid was positive in only three patients, serum was positive in four, whereas serum and seminal fluid were both negative in five. This study illustrates that ELISA is apparently less sensitive than GAT; however, it is certainly more practical and an easier method for antibody research in sera and in seminal fluid.
An immune-enzymatic method was developed for the determination of antispermatozoal antibodies. Sera of 94 infertile patients were studied with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Twelve patients were positive for antispermatozoal antibodies. Forty-six of these patients were studied also with the gelatin agglutination test (GAT). Eight sera were positive in the ELISA and nine in the GAT. With ELISA, immunoglobulin classes can be demonstrated; in fact, nine of our patients were positive for IgG and three for IgM. In all patients the IgA titer was less than 1:16. In addition, 61 seminal fluid specimens were studied by ELISA, and 7 were positive. The serum and seminal fluid of 12 patients were simultaneously studied. Seminal fluid was positive in only three patients, serum was positive in four, whereas serum and seminal fluid were both negative in five. This study illustrates that ELISA is apparently less sensitive than GAT; however, it is certainly more practical and an easier method for antibody research in sera and in seminal fluid.

