Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical care neglect.

D C Bross

    Child Abuse & Neglect
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    In the US, doctors must obtain informed consent for medical procedures. Judges may order life-saving treatment for children if parents object, based on specific legal factors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Protecting children from maltreatment in a hospital setting.

    Child abuse & neglect·2002
    Same author

    Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children.

    Child abuse & neglect·2000
    Same author

    Legal issues affecting dentistry's role in preventing child abuse and neglect.

    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1995
    Same author

    What have we learned about treating child physical abuse? A literature review of the last decade.

    Child abuse & neglect·1995
    Same author

    The pediatrician's documentation of child maltreatment.

    American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1992
    Same author

    The rights of children and national development: five models.

    Child abuse & neglect·1991

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Bioethics
    • Pediatric Healthcare

    Background:

    • Informed consent is a cornerstone of medical ethics and legal authorization for procedures.
    • Parental rights to consent or refuse medical treatment for children are generally respected.
    • Court intervention becomes necessary when parental decisions conflict with a child's best interests, particularly in life-saving situations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline the legal requirements for informed consent in the United States.
    • To examine the criteria judges use to order medical treatment for children against parental objections.
    • To establish a framework for determining when court intervention is justified in pediatric healthcare decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of American legal precedents regarding medical treatment and parental rights.
    Keywords:
    Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of factors influencing judicial decisions in child medical treatment cases.
  • Discussion of the process for assessing the threshold for court intervention.

    • Main Results:

    • Key factors supporting court-ordered treatment include: sufficient informed consent data, severe prognosis without treatment, urgency, non-experimental and likely successful procedures, few contraindications, potential for good quality of life post-treatment, older child's consent, and lack of conflicting medical opinions.
    • A process for court intervention is proposed when no minimally reasonable parent would refuse treatment.

    Conclusions:

    • While parental consent is paramount, courts can override objections to provide essential medical care for children.
    • The legal framework balances parental autonomy with the child's right to life and health.
    • Clear guidelines exist for judges to consider when intervening in medical decisions to protect a child's well-being.