Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing the evidence on HMO performance.

H S Luft

    The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) offer lower total costs than traditional insurance. However, the reasons for these cost differences are complex and not solely due to efficiency or quality factors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001
    Same author

    Context and community.

    Health services research·2001
    Same author

    Managed care in transition.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    Assessing the relationship between quality of care and the characteristics of health care organizations.

    Medical care research and review : MCRR·2000
    Same author

    A reply to Sullivan's reanalysis of managed care plan performance since 1980.

    American journal of public health·2000
    Same author

    Pharmacoeconomic analyses: making them transparent, making them credible.

    JAMA·2000
    Same journal

    Motherhood and apple pie: the effectiveness of medical care for children.

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    Same journal

    Who are the underinsured?

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    Same journal

    Life and death in a welfare state: end-stage renal disease in the United Kingdom.

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    Same journal

    Values and structure in the German health care systems.

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    Same journal

    Cognitive aspects of health surveys for public information and policy.

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    Same journal

    Cost containment and the quality of medical care: rationing strategies in an era of constrained resources.

    The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1985
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Healthcare Management
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) are a form of managed care.
    • HMOs provide comprehensive physician and hospital services for fixed periodic payments.
    • Previous understanding suggested cost savings were primarily due to efficiency or quality.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the reasons behind lower total costs for HMO members compared to conventional insurance plans.
    • To investigate factors beyond efficiency, quality, self-selection, or physician satisfaction contributing to cost differences.
    • To assess the potential impact of HMOs on traditional healthcare providers' competitive responses.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative cost analysis between HMO enrollees and conventional insurance plan members.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative assessment of contributing factors to cost variations.
  • Literature review on the competitive dynamics between different healthcare delivery models.
  • Main Results:

    • HMO members incur lower total costs than those in conventional insurance plans.
    • Cost differences are not solely attributable to efficiency, quality, consumer self-selection, or physician satisfaction.
    • The specific mechanisms driving these cost variations require further investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • While HMOs demonstrate cost advantages, the underlying drivers are multifaceted.
    • Public policy expectations regarding HMOs' competitive influence on traditional providers are not yet substantiated by sufficient evidence.
    • Further research is needed to understand the full implications of HMOs on the healthcare market.