Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

G Teasdale, R Knill-Jones, J van der Sande

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
    |July 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Acute Traumatic Intracranial Hematomas.

    Progress in neurological surgery·2016
    Same author

    Predicting the outcome.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
    Same author

    13(th) European Congress of Neurosurgery, September 2nd-7th, 2007, Glasgow.

    Acta neurochirurgica·2008
    Same author

    Treatment of intracranial aneurysms: techniques and specialisation and debate.

    Acta neurochirurgica·2006
    Same author

    12(th) European Congress of Neurosurgery, September 7th-12th, 2003, Lisbon.

    Acta neurochirurgica·2004
    Same author

    Calcium channel blockers for acute traumatic brain injury.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003

    The Glasgow Coma Scale offers reliable patient assessments for head injuries. This scale improves consistency across different observers and is valuable for monitoring and comparing acute brain damage cases.

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Trauma Care
    • Clinical Assessment

    Background:

    • Assessing consciousness and coma in head-injured patients presents challenges.
    • Commonly used descriptive terms often lead to significant observer discrepancies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the reliability of different assessment methods for head-injured patients.
    • To determine if the Glasgow Coma Scale offers more consistent assessments compared to general terms.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of patient assessments made by multiple observers.
    • Utilizing the Glasgow Coma Scale, which details eye opening, verbal response, and motor function.
    • Assessing consistency among neurosurgeons, general surgeons, and nurses.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Significant discrepancies were found when using overall "levels" of consciousness and coma.
    • The Glasgow Coma Scale demonstrated greater consistency among observers.
    • The scale showed resistance to variations in language and cultural backgrounds.

    Conclusions:

    • The Glasgow Coma Scale enhances the reliability of neurological assessments in head-injured patients.
    • Its practical reliability makes it valuable for individual patient monitoring and comparative studies.
    • The scale facilitates more meaningful comparisons between patient groups with acute brain damage.