Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The cervical facebow and mandibular rotation.

T J Fischer

    The Angle Orthodontist
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cervical facebow treatment significantly impacts mandibular rotation, but findings depend on the cephalometric superimposition method used. Sella-nasion and registration point methods revealed differences, unlike intersection and C.C. methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Orthodontic treatment acceleration with corticotomy-assisted exposure of palatally impacted canines.

    The Angle orthodontist·2007
    Same author

    Increased frequency of lymphoceles under treatment with sirolimus following renal transplantation: a single center experience.

    Transplantation proceedings·2002
    Same author

    Cantilever mechanics for treatment of impacted canines.

    Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2001
    Same author

    Disorders of the forearm axis.

    Hand clinics·1998
    Same author

    Properties of optical data from activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time assays.

    Thrombosis and haemostasis·1997
    Same author

    Negotiating managed care contracts.

    Comprehensive therapy·1997
    Same journal

    Impact of cone-beam computed tomography image quality on artificial intelligence-driven three-dimensional tooth segmentation and evaluation of external apical root resorption.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    Same journal

    Bracket transfer accuracy of two three-dimensionally printed lingual indirect bonding trays with different bracket frame designs.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    Same journal

    Biomechanical impact of beveling design on extrusion of a maxillary canine and a maxillary first molar: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    Same journal

    Effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer vs composite bonding agents for orthodontic bonding: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    Same journal

    Plastic deformation evaluation of clear aligners exposed to different cleaning solutions.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    Same journal

    Quantitative evaluation of an artificial intelligence-driven remote monitoring system for occlusion assessment using patient-captured images.

    The Angle orthodontist·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Orthodontics
    • Craniofacial Growth
    • Cephalometric Analysis

    Background:

    • Understanding the effects of orthodontic treatments on mandibular growth is crucial for effective treatment planning.
    • Cervical facebows are commonly used in orthodontics, but their precise influence on mandibular rotation requires further investigation.
    • The choice of cephalometric superimposition method can influence the interpretation of growth changes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the effect of cervical facebow treatment on mandibular rotation using a longitudinal study design.
    • To compare the efficacy of four different cephalometric superimposition methods in assessing treatment-induced mandibular rotation.

    Main Methods:

    • A longitudinal study comparing a headgear group (cervical facebow treatment) with a control group.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed.
  • Four distinct methods of cephalometric superimposition (sella-nasion, registration point, intersection, and C.C. methods) were employed to measure mandibular rotation in terms of direction and intensity.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant difference was observed among the four cephalometric superimposition methods.
    • The sella-nasion and registration point superimposition methods detected significant differences in mandibular growth direction and intensity between the headgear and control groups.
    • The intersection and C.C. superimposition methods did not reveal significant differences between the groups.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of cephalometric superimposition technique significantly influences the assessment of treatment effects on mandibular rotation.
    • Cervical facebow treatment can lead to significant changes in mandibular growth direction and intensity, detectable by specific superimposition methods.
    • The sella-nasion and registration point methods are more sensitive in detecting treatment-related mandibular rotation compared to the intersection and C.C. methods.