Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

10:50
Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae
Published on: June 8, 2015
Inter- and intra-examiner variability in scoring supragingival plaque: II. Statistical analysis
Summary
This study analyzed supragingival plaque scoring variability. Examiners showed no systematic differences based on profession or experience, but measurement error and inconsistent application of criteria were key issues.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Hygiene
- Clinical Measurement
Background:
- Accurate assessment of supragingival plaque is crucial for effective oral hygiene and periodontal health management.
- The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein plaque index is a commonly used method for quantifying plaque levels.
- Understanding variability in plaque scoring is essential for reliable clinical trials and patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess inter- and intra-examiner variability in scoring supragingival plaque using the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein method.
- To determine if professional background (dentist vs. dental hygienist) or experience level influences scoring consistency.
- To identify the primary sources of extraneous variation in plaque scoring.
Main Methods:
- Four examiners (dentists and dental hygienists with varying experience) each assessed plaque scores for 24 patients on two separate occasions.
- Data were analyzed to evaluate mean scores, score variability, and precision between and within examiners.
- Statistical analysis was employed to identify sources of measurement error and examiner-related variations.
Main Results:
- No significant systematic differences were found between dentists and dental hygienists in their mean, variability, or precision of plaque scores.
- Similarly, examiner experience did not correlate with systematic differences in scoring outcomes.
- Major sources of extraneous variation included measurement error, inter-examiner variability unrelated to training/experience, and inconsistent application of scoring criteria.
Conclusions:
- The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein method demonstrated considerable variability in supragingival plaque scoring.
- Factors beyond professional background and experience, such as measurement error and inconsistent criterion application, significantly impact scoring reliability.
- Standardization of training and clear application guidelines are recommended to improve the consistency of plaque index scoring in clinical practice.

