Related Experiment Videos
Is a microfilter necessary in a single unit blood transfusion
The New Zealand Medical Journal
|October 22, 1980
Summary
Standard blood filters (170 mu) do not appear to cause pulmonary dysfunction during small volume transfusions. A 27 mu filter is not justified, based on sheep study results.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Physiology
- Transfusion Medicine
Background:
- Microaggregates in transfused blood can potentially cause pulmonary dysfunction.
- Standard blood filters have a pore size of 170 mu.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of 27 mu and 170 mu pore filters on lung function during autologous blood transfusion in sheep.
- To determine if a finer pore filter (27 mu) is necessary for small volume transfusions.
Main Methods:
- Repeated autologous blood transfusions were administered to a sheep.
- Lung function was assessed by monitoring cardiac output, pulmonary shunt, and alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient.
- Measurements were taken before, during, and after transfusions with both 27 mu and 170 mu filters.
Main Results:
- No significant changes in cardiac output, pulmonary shunt, or alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient were observed with either filter type.
- The study found no evidence that microaggregates passing through a 170 mu filter caused pulmonary dysfunction in the sheep model.
Conclusions:
- The use of a more expensive 27 mu pore filter is not justified for small volume transfusions, based on these findings in sheep.
- Results suggest that standard 170 mu filters are adequate for preventing pulmonary dysfunction in limited transfusion volumes.