Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of three methods to estimate steatorrhoea
The New Zealand Medical Journal
|January 28, 1981
Summary
Estimating faecal fat excretion is crucial for diagnosing steatorrhoea. A 24-hour faecal collection with a cuprous thiocyanate marker proved more reliable than the 14C-triolein breath test for assessing fat absorption.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Nutritional Science
Background:
- Steatorrhoea, characterized by excessive fat in faeces, requires accurate diagnostic methods.
- Current diagnostic approaches include faecal fat collection and breath tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reliability of a 24-hour faecal fat collection method with the 14C-triolein breath test for estimating faecal fat excretion.
Main Methods:
- Faecal fat excretion was assessed in 24 patients using three methods: 3-day collection, 24-hour collection with a cuprous thiocyanate marker, and 14C-triolein breath test.
- Breath 14CO2 excretion was measured after a liquid meal containing 14C-triolein in an arachis oil emulsion.
Main Results:
- A good correlation (r=0.87) was found between the two quantitative faecal fat estimations, identifying 17 patients with steatorrhoea (>7 g/day).
- The 14C-triolein breath test yielded disappointing results, with seven steatorrhoea patients showing normal breath 14CO2 excretion.
- Increasing the fat load in the breath test improved detection but still resulted in abnormal results in non-steatorrhoea subjects.
Conclusions:
- The 24-hour faecal specimen collection using a cuprous thiocyanate marker is a more reliable method for estimating faecal fat excretion.
- The 14C-triolein breath test, in its tested configurations, is less reliable for diagnosing steatorrhoea compared to faecal fat collection.