Related Experiment Videos
Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|June 1, 1981
Summary
Eugenol-free zinc oxide paste demonstrated superior accuracy and stability for jaw relations registration over one week. Other materials like silicone and polyether showed significant differences, with zinc oxide-eugenol paste being the least accurate.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Accurate jaw relations registration is crucial for prosthodontic treatment success.
- Traditional materials may exhibit dimensional instability, compromising registration accuracy over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and stability of four jaw relations registration materials over a one-week period.
- To compare the performance of zinc oxide-eugenol paste, eugenol-free zinc oxide paste, silicone, and polyether.
Main Methods:
- A controlled laboratory study was conducted to assess material accuracy.
- Dimensional stability was measured at intervals over seven days using die scribes and sample measurements.
Main Results:
- Eugenol-free zinc oxide paste showed no statistically significant difference between die scribes and samples.
- Polyether, silicone, and zinc oxide-eugenol paste exhibited statistically significant differences.
- Zinc oxide-eugenol paste displayed the greatest dimensional instability, while polyether showed the least among the less accurate materials.
Conclusions:
- Eugenol-free zinc oxide paste is a highly accurate and stable material for jaw relations registration.
- The saponification reaction in eugenol-free zinc oxide paste contributes to its dimensional stability.
- Clinicians should consider the dimensional stability of registration materials to ensure accurate prosthodontic outcomes.