Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic stratification for the mandibular pain dysfunction syndrome

J P Smith

    Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
    |February 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Guidelines for the use of spiral computed tomography in screening for lung cancer.

    The European respiratory journal. Supplement·2003
    Same author

    The changing skill of new immigrants to the United States: recent trends and their determinants.

    Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research)·2002
    Same author

    Development of multiplexed fluorescence microbead covalent assays (FMCAs) for pesticide biomonitoring.

    Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2002
    Same author

    Immunization strategies to control a community-wide hepatitis A epidemic.

    Epidemiology and infection·2002
    Same author

    Early lung cancer action project: annual screening using single-slice helical CT.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2002
    Same author

    Medial and lateral meniscal tear patterns in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. A prospective analysis of 575 tears.

    The American journal of sports medicine·2001

    This study stratified patients with mandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (MDS) based on jaw movement patterns. This approach identified distinct patient groups with similar treatment outcomes, improving prognostic accuracy for MDS.

    Area of Science:

    • Dental Science
    • Clinical Research
    • Prognostic Studies

    Background:

    • Mandibular Pain Dysfunction Syndrome (MDS) presents complex symptoms and signs, often leading to patients being treated as a single group.
    • Current treatment comparisons for MDS lack validity due to the heterogeneity of patient presentations and prognoses.
    • Jaw movement patterns are key indicators of MDS but are not consistently used for patient stratification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and evaluate prognostic stratification systems for patients with Mandibular Pain Dysfunction Syndrome (MDS).
    • To identify distinct patient subgroups within MDS based on affected jaw movements and treatment outcomes.
    • To enable more accurate comparisons of treatment efficacy for MDS.

    Main Methods:

    • Prognostic stratification was applied to an inception cohort of 169 MDS patients.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients were grouped based on specific jaw movements associated with similar treatment outcomes.
  • Two staging systems for mandibular dysfunction were derived and evaluated using the collected data.

    • Main Results:

    • Stratification successfully separated MDS patients into groups with similar prognoses based on affected jaw movements.
    • The derived staging systems demonstrated potential for differentiating patient outcomes.
    • The findings suggest that jaw movement patterns are crucial for predicting treatment success in MDS.

    Conclusions:

    • Prognostic stratification based on jaw movement patterns is a viable approach for managing Mandibular Pain Dysfunction Syndrome (MDS).
    • The developed staging systems offer a foundation for more precise patient classification and treatment evaluation.
    • Further research with larger datasets is recommended to refine these systems and facilitate universal treatment comparisons for MDS.