Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology

|December 1, 1981

Summary

Faster screen/film combinations, including rare earth screens, are effective for orthodontic cephalometric measurements. These advanced radiographic techniques provide adequate visualization for skull and jaw landmark identification and overall assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dental radiology training requirements for credentialing the dental assistant.

The Dental assistant·1989

Same author

Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·1984

Same author

Duplicating radiographs.

Journal - Oklahoma Dental Association·1984

Same author

Comparison of interproximal carious lesion detection in panoramic and standard intraoral radiography.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1976

Area of Science:

Radiology
Orthodontics
Medical Imaging

Background:

Cephalometric radiography is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Evaluating the impact of different screen/film combinations on radiographic quality is essential for optimizing diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the usefulness of four different screen/film combinations for orthodontic cephalometric measurements.
To assess the adequacy of radiographic images for landmark identification and overall diagnostic value.

Main Methods:

Four lateral cephalometric radiographs were produced using varying screen/film combinations (speeds 1-4), with one using a grid and another rare earth phosphors.
Seven orthodontists evaluated the radiographs, identifying eight specific landmarks and assessing overall image quality.

Main Results:

No significant differences were found in landmark visualization or overall value among the tested screen/film combinations.
All tested screen/film combinations were deemed adequate for orthodontic measurements.

Conclusions:

Faster screen/film combinations, including those with rare earth screens, are both usable and useful for cephalometric radiography in orthodontics.
The choice of screen/film combination does not significantly impact the diagnostic quality for orthodontic skull and jaw measurements.

Related Experiment Videos