Comparison of written-visual and microslide-screening test measures in cytotechnology

A study was conducted to ascertain the relationships among different competence assessment methods for cytotechnologists. Of primary concern was the extent to which examinations using multiple choice questions, color plate photomicrographs and filmstrip formats measure abilities in common with or predict performance levels on a practical, job-sample-microslide examination format in gynecologic cytopathology. The majority of cytotechnologists who volunteered for these tests were trained in schools of cytotechnology approved by the Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation (CAHEA) of the American Medical Association (AMA). School training, certification by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) and by the American Society of Clinical Pathologists (ASCP) and participation in current continuing education activities were all associated with relatively higher test scores. The filmstrips format was least consistent in reflecting these distinctions. Overall, participants' scores in each test correlated to varying degrees with their scores on all other tests. Combinations of certain formats appear to have limited potential as performance evaluation methods; some of their drawbacks are presented.