Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reflections: ethics and the recombinant DNA debate

J W Robb

    Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ethical aspects of the use of animals in research.

    Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research·1991
    Same author

    The University of Southern California's Committee in Action.

    Laboratory animal science·1987
    Same author

    The British choice in health care: a report from London.

    The Pharos of Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Medical Society. Alpha Omega Alpha·1985
    Same author

    The Christian and the new biology.

    Encounter·1981
    Same author

    Ethics and the health professions.

    CDA journal·1979
    Same author

    Analysis of choice and value conflict.

    The Journal of long term care administration·1976
    Same journal

    Bone mineral density in the growing human mandible.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    Same journal

    Palate vault morphology in Down syndrome.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    Same journal

    Interrelation between fusions in the primary dentition and agenesis in the succedaneous permanent dentition seen from an embryological point of view.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    Same journal

    Correlation of HSP110 expression with all-trans retinoic acid-induced apoptosis.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    Same journal

    Secalonic acid D alters the expression and phosphorylation of the transcription factors and their binding to cAMP response element in developing murine secondary palate.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    Same journal

    Dentition development and budding morphogenesis.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·2001
    See all related articles

    This essay explores ethical considerations in recombinant DNA research, emphasizing a five-aspect analysis for responsible decision-making. It highlights the need for caution and public good in genetic interventions.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Molecular Biology
    • Genetics

    Background:

    • The rapid advancement of recombinant DNA technology presents complex ethical challenges.
    • Existing ethical frameworks may not fully address the implications of genetic manipulation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To apply a structured ethical reflection to the recombinant DNA debate.
    • To encourage a higher level of reader consciousness regarding significant ethical issues in genetic research.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing a five-aspect ethical analysis: nature of the act, consequences, laws, moral principles, and intention.
    • Applying this paradigm to specific areas: risks vs. benefits, regulations, market implications, and human genetic intervention.

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The analysis identifies key ethical dimensions within the recombinant DNA debate.
    • It underscores the tension between freedom of inquiry and the need for social responsibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical responsibility in DNA research demands careful consideration of short-term and long-term consequences.
    • Individual integrity and a commitment to the public good are paramount for responsible scientific practice.