Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protecting hearing in a military environment

M R Forrest

    Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Hearing protection effectiveness was evaluated for continuous and impulse noise, showing agreement with standard methods but highlighting practical usage limitations. Solutions for user acceptance issues like discomfort and communication difficulties are proposed.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effects of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin on the tone of human saphenous vein.

    Anesthesia and analgesia·2001
    Same author

    The efficiency of hearing protection to impulse noise.

    Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum·1980
    Same author

    Problems of communication and ear protection in the Royal marines.

    Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service·1970
    Same author

    Hearing hazard from small-bore weapons.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1968

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health
    • Acoustics Engineering
    • Military Science

    Background:

    • Noise exposure in military and industrial settings necessitates effective hearing protection.
    • Standard hearing protectors include earplugs, earmuffs, and noise-excluding helmets.
    • User acceptance of hearing protection is often low due to comfort and communication issues.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the effectiveness of hearing protectors against continuous and impulse noise.
    • To compare laboratory measurements with real-world performance.
    • To identify and propose solutions for user-related problems with hearing protection.

    Main Methods:

    • Evaluation of hearing protector effectiveness for both continuous and impulse noise environments.
    • Comparison of results with the real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) method.
    • Analysis of user-reported issues including comfort, speech intelligibility, and equipment compatibility.

    Main Results:

    • Hearing protector effectiveness measurements generally align with REAT results.
    • Exceptions to REAT agreement were observed and analyzed.
    • Practical protection levels are often lower than laboratory-measured values.
    • User-reported discomfort, speech communication difficulties, and incompatibility with other gear were identified as key issues.

    Conclusions:

    • Hearing protectors are crucial for mitigating noise risks in the Army and industry.
    • While laboratory tests provide a baseline, real-world effectiveness can be significantly lower.
    • Addressing user-centric issues is vital for improving the practical application and acceptance of hearing protection.

    Related Experiment Videos