Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cerebellar stimulation for cerebral palsy

C K Whittaker

    Journal of Neurosurgery
    |May 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    Cerebellar stimulators did not show a discernible effect in children with cerebral palsy during a double-blind trial. Neither patients nor physicians could differentiate between real and sham stimulation, indicating no clear benefit.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Genetic analysis in the diagnosis of familial paragangliomas.

    The Laryngoscope·2000
    Same author

    Middle fossa and hearing preservation.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1998
    Same author

    Secondary closure.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1998
    Same author

    Indications for removal of optic nerve sheath meningioma.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·1997
    Same author

    Facial nerve dysfunction.

    The American journal of otology·1996
    Same author

    To abandon or not abandon: antesigmoid craniotomy with retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section.

    Ear, nose, & throat journal·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Pediatric Rehabilitation

    Background:

    • Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of movement disorders affecting muscle tone and posture.
    • Cerebellar stimulation is an emerging therapy explored for managing CP symptoms.
    • Objective assessment of cerebellar stimulator efficacy is crucial for clinical application.

    Observation:

    • A double-blind, cross-over study was conducted involving eight children with CP.
    • Participants received either real or sham cerebellar stimulation for 3-week periods.
    • Physician evaluators and patients were blinded to the stimulation status.

    Findings:

    • Neither the evaluating physicians nor the pediatric patients could distinguish between active and placebo (sham) cerebellar stimulation.
    • The study found no statistically significant observable difference in outcomes attributed to the stimulation.

    Implications:

    • Current cerebellar stimulation protocols may require refinement for CP management.
    • Further research is needed to identify patient subgroups or stimulation parameters that yield measurable benefits.
    • This study highlights the importance of rigorous blinding and objective outcome measures in evaluating neurostimulation therapies.

    Related Experiment Videos