Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring pharmacist time use: a note on the use of fixed-interval work sampling

American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy

|October 1, 1978

Summary

Fixed-interval work sampling provides results comparable to random-interval methods for assessing pharmacist time use. This efficient technique accurately captures pharmacist tasks, duties, competencies, and productivity without bias.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

CHRONIC APPENDICITIS.

British medical journal·2010

Same author

Antidepressant prescribing patterns: a comparison of blacks and whites in a medicaid population.

Clinical drug investigation·2008

Same author

Sulfonylurea pharmacotherapy regimen adherence in a Medicaid population: influence of age, gender, and race.

The Diabetes educator·1999

Same author

Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Part II.

PharmacoEconomics·1993

Same author

Consumer reaction to a direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising campaign.

Journal of health care marketing·1988

Same author

Pharmacy student and faculty perceptions on pharmacy career opportunities. Report of the Professional Affairs Committee.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·1986

Area of Science:

Pharmacy practice
Workforce management
Time-motion studies

Background:

Accurate measurement of pharmacist time utilization is crucial for operational efficiency and resource allocation.
Traditional random-interval observation methods are standard but can be resource-intensive.
Exploring alternative sampling methods like fixed-interval observation is warranted to improve efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the validity and reliability of fixed-interval work sampling against random-interval observation for measuring pharmacist time use.
To determine if fixed-interval sampling introduces bias in assessing pharmacist tasks, duties, competencies, and productivity.
To assess the feasibility of implementing fixed-interval work sampling in community pharmacy settings.

Main Methods:

A three-month study was conducted in a single community pharmacy.
Pharmacist activities were observed using both fixed-interval and random-interval sampling methods.
Four key measures were assessed: tasks, duties, competencies, and productivity.

Main Results:

No statistically significant differences were found between fixed-interval and random-interval methods for any of the four measures (p > 0.05).
The fixed-interval method provided comparable estimates of pharmacist time use to the standard random-interval procedure.
Pharmacist work patterns did not exhibit cyclical behavior that would bias fixed-interval sampling.

Conclusions:

Fixed-interval work sampling is a valid and reliable alternative to random-interval methods for studying pharmacist time use.
This method offers a potentially more efficient approach to understanding pharmacist workload and productivity.
The findings support the use of fixed-interval sampling in pharmacy practice research and management.

Related Experiment Videos