Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Age, reading, and myopia

J Angle, D A Wissmann

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |May 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study found that years of schooling, not age, explain myopia development in 12-17 year olds. Increased education correlates with myopia onset and progression, averaging 0.22 D per academic year.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data.

    Physical review letters·2011
    Same author

    Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from the XENON10 experiment.

    Physical review letters·2008
    Same author

    First results from the XENON10 dark matter experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory.

    Physical review letters·2008
    Same author

    Liver transplantation: incidence and management of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli.

    Transplantation proceedings·1997
    Same author

    Asplenism and systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Clinical rheumatology·1995
    Same author

    Computerized health information from the Federal Government.

    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science·1985
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatric Ophthalmology
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Myopia (nearsightedness) is a growing public health concern.
    • Existing theories suggest either environmental (use-abuse) or biological (age) factors drive myopia.
    • Adolescence is a critical period for myopia development and progression.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether the use-abuse theory or biological theory better explains myopia in US adolescents aged 12-17.
    • To determine the relationship between educational attainment and myopia.
    • To quantify myopia progression rates in relation to academic years.

    Main Methods:

    • Regression analysis was employed to analyze the relationship between myopia and explanatory variables.
    • Key variables included age (from birth and puberty) and educational attainment (years of schooling).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data was collected from adolescents aged 12-17 in the United States.

    • Main Results:

    • Educational attainment was found to explain the entire tendency for myopia to appear and progress.
    • After controlling for education, age was not significantly related to increased myopia.
    • Myopia progressed at an average rate of 0.22 D per academic year.

    Conclusions:

    • The use-abuse theory, specifically cumulative reading exposure indicated by schooling, provides a stronger explanation for myopia in adolescents than biological age.
    • While education is a significant factor, it accounts for only a small portion of the overall variance in myopia.
    • Further research is needed to identify other contributing factors to myopia development.