Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative imaging using the Cleon emission tomography system: recent developments

M A Flower, R P Parker

    Radiology
    |November 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Image intensity normalisation by maximising the Siddon line integral in the joint intensity distribution space.

    Medical image analysis·2009
    Same author

    The PETRRA positron camera: design, characterization and results of a physical evaluation.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2005
    Same author

    Statistical pixelwise inference models for planar data analysis: an application to gamma-camera uniformity monitoring.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2004
    Same author

    Scaling images using their background ratio. An application in statistical comparisons of images.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2003
    Same author

    Automated CT marker segmentation for image registration in radionuclide therapy.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2002
    Same author

    Continuous angiotensin II infusion increases tumour: normal blood flow ratio in colo-rectal liver metastases.

    British journal of cancer·2001
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    A new method for attenuation correction in radioactive measurements shows significant improvement, reducing systematic errors from -60% to -14% by accounting for source and background variations.

    Area of Science:

    • Nuclear physics
    • Medical imaging physics

    Background:

    • Accurate attenuation correction is crucial for quantitative analysis in nuclear imaging.
    • Traditional methods struggle with complex source and background distributions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate a revised method for attenuation correction.
    • To evaluate its performance under varying experimental conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Experiments were conducted using discrete radioactive sources within a background.
    • Source size, position, and concentration ratios were systematically varied.
    • Results were compared between old and new attenuation correction techniques.

    Main Results:

    • The revised method demonstrated marked improvement over previous techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic errors in radioactive concentration measurements on the central axis were reduced from -60% to -14%.
  • Error reduction is dependent on source size, position, and concentration ratios, but can be accounted for.
  • Conclusions:

    • The revised attenuation correction method offers superior accuracy.
    • Experimental data can be used to compensate for remaining systematic errors.
    • This improved method enhances quantitative reliability in radioactive measurements.