Case Studies
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
This paper introduces the problem-oriented case report as a new approach to clinical training. Unlike traditional methods that focus on listing patient findings, this approach structures learning around identifying and solving clinical problems. The method involves three steps: listing problems, planning solutions, and evaluating new findings. The authors suggest that this approach improves how students identify and classify issues, especially psychosocial and health-educational problems. It encourages students to consider multiple problems and their interrelations, moving beyond individual problem fixation. This method may enhance student responsibility and instructor oversight by requiring independent problem formulation and solution planning. The problem-oriented case report also supports structured physician communication and decision-making skills.
Area of Science:
Background:
Traditional clinical training often relies on classical case reports, where students document patient complaints and findings in a linear format. This approach may limit the ability to address complex, interconnected health issues. Prior research has shown that classical case reports focus narrowly on individual findings, potentially overlooking broader diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. No prior work had resolved how to better integrate psychosocial and behavioral aspects into clinical documentation. This gap motivated the exploration of alternative training methods. The problem-oriented case report emerged as a potential solution, emphasizing structured problem identification and resolution. It was already known that students benefit from active engagement with clinical scenarios. However, the specific impact of problem-oriented approaches on student responsibility and instructor oversight remained unclear. This paper addresses that uncertainty by examining the application of Weed’s problem-oriented case report in clinical training.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the problem-oriented case report as a training principle in clinical education. This approach shifts focus from passive documentation to active problem-solving. It seeks to improve how students identify and classify clinical issues. The method encourages students to formulate problems rather than merely listing findings. The study explores how this shift affects diagnostic and therapeutic planning. It also examines whether this method enhances the integration of psychosocial and health-educational aspects. The authors propose that this approach fosters greater student responsibility and improves instructor oversight. By analyzing the structure and outcomes of problem-oriented case reports, the study aims to highlight their educational advantages.
Main Methods:
The problem-oriented case report is structured in three parts. First, complaints and findings are formulated as problems and listed. Second, a plan is created to solve each problem. Third, new findings are assigned to relevant problems and evaluated for their diagnostic or therapeutic value. This method requires students to move beyond passive observation and engage in problem-solving. The approach is contrasted with classical case reports, which focus on linear documentation. The study uses this structured format to assess its impact on clinical training. It evaluates whether the method improves the completeness of problem identification. The method also examines how well it integrates psychosocial and behavioral aspects into clinical documentation. The authors analyze how this approach influences student responsibility and instructor oversight.
Main Results:
The problem-oriented case report leads to more complete problem identification compared to classical methods. It simplifies the classification of psychosocial and health-educational problems. Students are required to move from individual problem fixation to evaluating multiple problems and their interrelations. This approach facilitates better integration of diagnostic and therapeutic steps. It also enhances student responsibility by requiring independent problem formulation. The method allows instructors to monitor progress more effectively. The problem-oriented case report provides a structured framework for physician communication. It supports the development of problem-related documentation and decision-making skills.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest that the problem-oriented case report improves clinical training by emphasizing structured problem-solving. It allows for better integration of psychosocial and health-educational aspects. The method encourages students to consider multiple problems and their interrelations. This approach may enhance student responsibility and instructor oversight. The problem-oriented case report provides a framework for physician communication. It supports the development of diagnostic and therapeutic planning skills. The authors propose that this method has an integrating role in increasingly specialized medical training. They suggest that it offers a more comprehensive and structured approach to clinical documentation.
The problem-oriented case report structures clinical training by identifying and solving problems in three steps: problem formulation, solution planning, and evaluation of new findings.
Classical case reports focus on linear documentation of findings, while the problem-oriented approach emphasizes structured problem identification and resolution.
Problem formulation shifts focus from passive observation to active problem-solving, encouraging students to identify and classify clinical issues.
New findings are assigned to relevant problems and evaluated for their diagnostic or therapeutic value in the third step of the process.
Students independently formulate problems and develop diagnostic and therapeutic steps, enhancing their responsibility and decision-making skills.
The authors suggest that this method has an integrating role in increasingly specialized medical training by encouraging comprehensive problem evaluation.