Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selection bias in epidemiologic studies

D G Kleinbaum, H Morgenstern, L L Kupper

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |April 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Effect of a Regimen of Antifungal Cream Use on Episodes of Acute Adenolymphangitis (ADL) among Lymphedema Patients: An Application Using Marginal Structural Models.

    Journal of epidemiology and global health·2019
    Same author

    Clustering of esophageal cancer among white men in the United States.

    Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2018
    Same author

    Shared and Study-specific Dietary Patterns and Head and Neck Cancer Risk in an International Consortium.

    Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2018
    Same author

    The role of oral hygiene in head and neck cancer: results from International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2016
    Same author

    Vitamin E intake from natural sources and head and neck cancer risk: a pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology consortium.

    British journal of cancer·2015
    Same author

    Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (Part 2 of 2): use of quality of life to assess construct validity of the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Static Physician's Global Assessment.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2015
    Same journal

    Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Maternal Cesarean Section and Offspring ASD or ADHD Risk: A Nurses' Health Study II Analysis.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Understanding selection bias is crucial for accurate research. This study offers a quantitative framework to identify and analyze selection bias in various study designs, improving research validity.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Evaluating etiologic associations requires careful subject selection.
    • Selection bias can significantly impact the validity of research findings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a quantitative conceptual framework for understanding selection bias.
    • To integrate epidemiologic and statistical considerations for bias analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Developing a framework to identify conditions conducive to selection bias.
    • Quantifying the direction and magnitude of potential bias.
    • Analyzing how bias characteristics vary across different study designs.

    Main Results:

    • The framework provides a systematic approach to assess selection bias.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identifies specific conditions and study designs prone to selection bias.
  • Offers methods to quantify the impact of selection bias on results.

    • Conclusions:

    • A quantitative framework enhances the understanding and management of selection bias.
    • Applying this framework improves the validity of etiologic association studies.
    • Recognizing and addressing selection bias is essential for robust scientific evidence.