Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Technical factors important to dorsal column stimulation

R Davis, E Gray

    Applied Neurophysiology
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A multi-centre performance evaluation of a commercially developed liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of brain tumours.

    ESMO open·2025
    Same author

    Corrigendum to "Mangrove preservation could have significantly reduced damages from Hurricane Otis on the coast of Guerrero, Mexico" [Sci. Total Environ. (2024), 177822].

    The Science of the total environment·2025
    Same author

    Mangrove preservation could have significantly reduced damages from Hurricane Otis on the coast of Guerrero, Mexico.

    The Science of the total environment·2024
    Same author

    An update on oral cavity cancer: epidemiological trends, prevention strategies and novel approaches in diagnosis and prognosis.

    Community dental health·2022
    Same author

    Variation in chemotherapy prescribing rates and mortality in early breast cancer over two decades: a national data linkage study.

    ESMO open·2021
    Same author

    Average SAR prediction, validation, and evaluation for a compact MR scanner head-sized RF coil.

    Magnetic resonance imaging·2021

    Fully implantable dorsal column stimulation (DCS) systems show superior long-term efficacy and reliability compared to RF-linked systems for neurological conditions. This advancement offers better patient outcomes in managing chronic pain and neurological deficits.

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Neurosurgery
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Dorsal column stimulation (DCS) is a neuromodulation technique used for managing neurological conditions.
    • Previous systems, like RF-linked devices, had limitations in long-term performance and reliability.
    • Advancements in implantable stimulator technology were explored to improve patient outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the long-term efficacy and reliability of RF-linked DCS systems versus fully implantable programmable stimulators.
    • To evaluate patient adherence and device performance over several years.
    • To identify factors influencing the success of DCS in patients with neurological deficits.

    Main Methods:

    • A cohort of 101 patients with neurological conditions received DCS over 5.5 years.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients were implanted with either RF-linked systems (65) or fully implantable programmable stimulators (36).
  • Device failures, patient usage rates, and electrode-related complications were monitored.

    • Main Results:

    • RF-linked systems experienced a 20% failure rate, while fully implantable systems had no failures apart from battery depletion.
    • After 5 years, only 23% of RF system users continued DCS, compared to 81% of fully implantable system users after 4 years.
    • Electrode displacement (27 patients) and breakage (6 patients) were observed, with cathodal stimulation proving more efficient than anodal.

    Conclusions:

    • Fully implantable programmable stimulators offer significantly better long-term usability and reliability than RF-linked systems for DCS.
    • DCS technology has evolved, with newer fully implantable devices providing sustained therapeutic benefits for patients.
    • Optimizing electrode placement and stimulation parameters (cathodal vs. anodal) is crucial for DCS effectiveness.