Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations

M B Shields

    Survey of Ophthalmology
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The non-contact tonometer accurately measures normal intraocular pressure and is ideal for mass screening. However, it is less reliable for elevated pressures and has limitations with abnormal corneas.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A lesson from the study of secondary glaucomas: the 14th robert N. Shaffer lecture.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the glaucoma-scope.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Trabeculectomy and optic nerve head topography.

    Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2006
    Same author

    Axenfeld-Rieger and iridocorneal endothelial syndromes: two spectra of disease with striking similarities and differences.

    Journal of glaucoma·2002
    Same author

    Influence of surgical reduction of intraocular pressure on regions of the visual field with different levels of sensitivity.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2001
    Same author

    Latanoprost and cystoid macular edema in high-risk aphakic or pseudophakic eyes.

    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2001
    Same journal

    Trends in pediatric uveitis: A systematic review and meta-epidemiological investigation of geographic, economic, and climate factors.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy and safety of different intraocular therapies for non-infectious uveitis: A network meta-analysis.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Macular telangiectasia masqueraders.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Utilization of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in childhood glaucoma: A systematic review.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome: Clinical and imaging features, diagnostic differentiation and therapeutic strategies.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Prognostic factors and postoperative outcomes in pediatric cataract patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Medical Devices

    Background:

    • Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing glaucoma.
    • Traditional Goldmann applanation tonometry requires corneal contact and anesthesia, posing risks.
    • Non-contact tonometry offers a potentially safer and more accessible alternative.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the reliability of non-contact tonometry for IOP measurement.
    • To compare its performance against Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    • To identify its suitability for mass screening and clinical applications.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and comparative study of non-contact tonometry against Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    • Analysis of measurement accuracy across different intraocular pressure ranges.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of practical considerations such as ease of use and patient factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-contact tonometry demonstrates reliability for measuring intraocular pressures within the normal range.
    • It eliminates risks associated with corneal contact and topical anesthesia.
    • Accuracy is reduced in patients with elevated intraocular pressure and abnormal corneas.
    • The device is suitable for use by paramedical personnel in mass screening programs.

    Conclusions:

    • Non-contact tonometry is a valuable tool for screening normal intraocular pressure, offering safety and efficiency.
    • Its limitations in higher pressure ranges and with corneal abnormalities necessitate careful consideration.
    • Further research may explore its utility in specific patient populations and therapeutic studies.