Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Role of extraperitoneal cesarean section

R P Perkins

    Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |June 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    Extraperitoneal cesarean section (CS) is a viable alternative for uterine infections, offering potential benefits in surgical training and infection avoidance. Further controlled studies are needed to establish its true advantages over transperitoneal CS.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Immune to the concept.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1998
    Same author

    Requiem for a heavyweight: the demise of scalp blood pH sampling.

    The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine·1997
    Same author

    "Abruption" and assumption.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1997
    Same author

    Determining the time before birth when ischemia and hypoxemia initiated cerebral palsy.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·1996
    Same author

    Of policies and palsies.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1996
    Same author

    Management of rupture of the fetal membranes.

    The Nebraska medical journal·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Surgical Innovation
    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

    Background:

    • Extraperitoneal cesarean section (CS) is often met with emotional responses, particularly from those unfamiliar with the technique.
    • Despite advancements in antibiotics, post-CS infection remains a significant concern, necessitating exploration of alternative surgical approaches.
    • The extraperitoneal approach offers potential benefits in surgical training and rational basis for avoiding pelvic infectious complications.

    Observation:

    • Data suggests extraperitoneal CS has no greater hazard than transperitoneal CS once surgeons are accustomed to the procedure.
    • Higher preoperative antibiotic use in the extraperitoneal group was linked to greater patient preoperative morbidity.
    • Lower Apgar scores at 1 minute and increased incidence of premature infants in distress were noted, alongside potential delays by inexperienced surgeons.

    Findings:

    • Extraperitoneal CS is a viable alternative to transperitoneal delivery or hysterectomy in cases of uterine infection.
    • The procedure has attractive rationale and potential for avoiding serious postoperative pelvic infectious complications.
    • While not showing distinct advantages, the extraperitoneal approach warrants reconsideration due to its infection-avoidance potential.

    Implications:

    • Prospective, controlled studies are essential to determine the true benefits and risks of extraperitoneal CS.
    • Routine retrovesical space draining in comparison groups could clarify the extraperitoneal approach's specific advantages.
    • Resident education programs should include extraperitoneal CS to broaden surgical skills and offer options for managing pelvic infections.

    Related Experiment Videos