Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of methods for identifying Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp

B A Gunn, F L Singleton, E R Peele

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    |August 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    The lysostaphin susceptibility test is the most effective method for differentiating staphylococci and micrococci, offering speed and ease of use. Other methods like anaerobic growth and dextrose fermentation are less reliable and slower for accurate bacterial identification.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of Processing and Storing Oyster Meats on Concentrations of Indicator Bacteria, Vibrios and Aeromonas hydrophila.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    Effect of Processing and Storing Oyster Meats on Concentrations of Indicator Bacteria, Vibrios and Aeromonas hydrophila.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    A Medium for Presumptive Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    Seasonal Concentration of Coliform Bacteria by Crassostrea virginica , the Eastern Oyster, in Chesapeake Bay.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    A Medium for Presumptive Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    SYN-004 (ribaxamase), an oral beta-lactamase, mitigates antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis in a porcine gut microbiome model.

    Journal of applied microbiology·2017

    Area of Science:

    • Microbiology
    • Bacteriology
    • Diagnostic Microbiology

    Background:

    • Accurate differentiation between staphylococci and micrococci is crucial in clinical and environmental microbiology.
    • Existing methods for distinguishing these genera can be prone to misinterpretation and erratic results.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of three common methods for differentiating staphylococci from micrococci.
    • To identify the most reliable, rapid, and user-friendly method for routine diagnostics.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of three distinct microbiological tests.
    • Utilized both clinical and environmental isolates of staphylococci and micrococci.
    • Evaluated lysostaphin susceptibility, facultative anaerobic growth in thioglycolate, and dextrose fermentation.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The lysostaphin susceptibility test demonstrated superior sensitivity, speed, and ease of use.
    • Facultative anaerobic growth and dextrose fermentation yielded slower results and were associated with technical challenges.
    • Potential for misclassification of certain species was noted with the latter two methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Lysostaphin susceptibility testing is recommended as the preferred method for distinguishing staphylococci and micrococci.
    • The study provides practical suggestions to mitigate errors associated with traditional differentiation techniques.
    • Optimizing diagnostic accuracy for these important bacterial genera is essential for reliable identification.