Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability

J E Galbraith, M L Murphy, N de Soyza

    JAMA
    |November 3, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Sources of variation in rates of in vitro ruminal protein degradation.

    Journal of dairy science·2004
    Same author

    IL-10 mediates susceptibility to Leishmania donovani infection.

    European journal of immunology·2001
    Same author

    Intravenous administration of an E1/E3-deleted adenoviral vector induces tolerance to factor IX in C57BL/6 mice.

    Gene therapy·2001
    Same author

    A prospective observational study of 5-, 7-, and 10-day antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2001
    Same author

    Correlation of preoperative computed tomography and postoperative ocular motility in orbital blowout fractures.

    Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000
    Same author

    Outcomes after judicious antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections seen in a private pediatric practice.

    Pediatrics·2000
    Same journal

    Deescalation, Discontinuation, and Deimplementation Trials: Evaluating Whether and How to Do Less.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for GERD.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    The Psychedelic Therapies Executive Order: On Approval and Clinical Readiness.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    "Suturing": Love, Death, and Perfection's Limits.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    What Is Low Back Pain?

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    From Silicon Valley to the Vatican-The Expanding Debate on AI Ethics.

    JAMA·2026
    See all related articles

    This study assessed coronary angiogram interpretation accuracy by comparing clinical readings with postmortem data. While generally accurate, a majority opinion did not always resolve discrepancies, indicating interpretation limitations.

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Pathology
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Coronary angiography is a key diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease.
    • Interobserver variability in interpreting angiograms can affect clinical decisions.
    • Pathological findings serve as the gold standard for accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine interobserver variability in coronary angiogram interpretation.
    • To correlate premortem coronary angiograms with postmortem data.
    • To assess the accuracy of clinical interpretations against pathological findings.

    Main Methods:

    • Three cardiologists independently interpreted coronary angiograms.
    • Interpretations were compared with postmortem pathological data.
    • Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were analyzed.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • No substantial difference in overall diagnostic accuracy was found among the three cardiologists.
    • Most substantial angiographic lesions were pathologically verified.
    • Majority opinions accurately identified pathological lesions in 50% of false-positive/negative interpretations.

    Conclusions:

    • Coronary angiography is an excellent diagnostic tool.
    • Limitations in interpretation accuracy persist, even with majority opinion.
    • Pathological correlation is crucial for validating angiographic findings.