Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Form, function, growth, and craniofacial surgery

H Aduss

    Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
    |November 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Craniofacial surgery offers new hope for patients with complex malformations. This study investigates how surgery impacts the growth of craniofacial skeletons in conditions like cleft lip and palate and Apert syndrome.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cephalometric study of the Apert syndrome in adolescence and adulthood.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·1999
    Same author

    Iliac versus cranial bone for secondary grafting of residual alveolar clefts.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1991
    Same author

    The role of gingival mucoperiosteal flaps in the repair of alveolar clefts.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1989
    Same author

    Tooth maturation in cleft lip, cleft palate, or both.

    The Cleft palate journal·1988
    Same author

    Tooth eruption and craniofacial development in congenital hypothyroidism: report of case.

    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1987
    Same author

    Pre- and postsurgical facial growth in patients with Crouzon's and Apert's syndromes.

    The Cleft palate journal·1986
    Same journal

    Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Impact on Medical and Surgical Management.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Little Tube; Big Problems: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Current State of Button Battery Ingestion Injuries.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic Algorithm for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Indications for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Revisiting Eustachian Tube Anatomy and Physiology.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Craniofacial Surgery
    • Pediatric Plastic Surgery
    • Orthodontics

    Background:

    • Craniofacial surgery, introduced in the 1970s, expanded treatment options for previously ineligible patients.
    • Complex craniofacial malformations present unique challenges regarding growth and surgical outcomes.
    • Otolaryngologists and multidisciplinary teams encounter a wider range of patient phenotypes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the form, function, and growth patterns of craniofacial malformations.
    • To understand the effects of surgical intervention on craniofacial growth.
    • To analyze the natural history of specific craniofacial anomalies and surgical timing.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of craniofacial growth in four categories of malformations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of surgical timing and its impact on growth.
  • Discussion of habilitation within the context of anomaly natural history.
  • Main Results:

    • Craniofacial surgery has significantly altered treatment paradigms.
    • Understanding growth patterns is crucial for effective surgical planning.
    • The timing of interventions critically influences habilitation outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Surgery's effect on craniofacial growth is a key consideration in patient management.
    • The natural history of anomalies informs surgical timing and habilitation strategies.
    • Multidisciplinary approaches are essential for managing complex craniofacial conditions.