Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What was wrong with Anna O?

L C Hurst

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
    |February 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Anna O. case, central to psychoanalysis, may have had organic causes, not psychogenic ones. Breuer's cathartic method likely did not cure her hysteria.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Venous aneurysms of the wrist.

    The Journal of hand surgery·2001
    Same author

    Enzyme injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren's disease.

    The Journal of hand surgery·2000
    Same author

    The biochemistry of Dupuytren's disease.

    Hand clinics·1999
    Same author

    Nonoperative treatment of Dupuytren's disease.

    Hand clinics·1999
    Same author

    Scapholunate dissociation: an experimental kinematic study of two types of indirect soft tissue repairs.

    The Journal of hand surgery·1997
    Same author

    Collagenase in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease: an in vitro study.

    The Journal of hand surgery·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Psychiatry
    • Medical History

    Background:

    • The seminal case of Fräulein Anna O. (Bertha Pappenheim) was foundational to psychoanalytic theory.
    • Detailed in Breuer and Freud's 'Studies on Hysteria' (1895), her case is a cornerstone of psychodynamic literature.

    Observation:

    • Re-examination of Anna O.'s case history suggests potential organic etiological factors.
    • This challenges the prevailing psychogenic explanations for her symptoms.

    Findings:

    • The study questions the validity of psychogenesis as the sole cause of hysteria in this historical case.
    • Evidence is presented to postulate an organic basis for Anna O.'s condition, contrary to Freud and Breuer's conclusions.

    Implications:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • This re-evaluation may necessitate a revision of historical psychoanalytic case interpretations.
    • It highlights the importance of considering organic factors in complex neurological and psychiatric presentations.
    • The efficacy of Breuer's cathartic method for hysteria is critically assessed and found potentially unsubstantiated.