Related Experiment Videos
Summary
Pharmacy education has progressed significantly, but faces challenges in the 1980s. The profession must adopt the Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) as the entry-level degree to resolve internal conflict.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacy Education
- Higher Education Policy
Background:
- Pharmacy education has experienced a decade of substantial advancement.
- Progress is evident in faculty expansion, curriculum innovation, and enhanced clinical and research initiatives.
Observation:
- The transition into the 1980s coincides with significant economic, social, and political shifts.
- These external changes pose potential impacts on both pharmacy education and the profession itself.
- Resource scarcity presents a considerable challenge for educational institutions and professional development.
Findings:
- The profession faces a critical juncture regarding entry-level degree requirements.
- A dual-degree system is identified as a source of internal conflict and professional anguish.
- The Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) is proposed as the necessary entry-level degree to unify the profession.
Implications:
- Adopting a single entry-level degree (Pharm.D.) is crucial for resolving professional division.
- Failure to address the degree issue may perpetuate internal conflict and hinder progress.
- Strategic adaptation to evolving societal needs and resource availability is essential for the future of pharmacy education.