Related Experiment Videos
Medicare's nursing-home benefit: variations in interpretation
The New England Journal of Medicine
|September 30, 1982
Summary
Medicare coverage for skilled-nursing facilities varies significantly due to inconsistent administrative interpretations. Centralized oversight and reviewer training are recommended to improve consistency in Medicare coverage decisions.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Public Health Policy
- Healthcare Administration
Background:
- Medicare beneficiaries' use of skilled-nursing facilities (SNFs) shows considerable state-level variation.
- This variation may stem from differing administrative interpretations of Medicare coverage rules.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether variations in SNF care days reflect differences in claims reviewer discretion.
- To identify the extent of variability in Medicare coverage decisions among reviewers.
Main Methods:
- Developed nine hypothetical patient cases designed to test reviewer discretion.
- Presented cases via telephone to claims reviewers at fiscal intermediaries and professional standards review organizations.
- Analyzed reviewer decisions and justifications for coverage.
Main Results:
- Significant differences observed in reviewers' decisions to cover or deny patient care.
- Reviewer reasoning for coverage decisions also varied markedly.
- Consensus among 18 reviewers was reached in only two of the nine hypothetical cases.
Conclusions:
- The observed variation in SNF coverage is attributed to the complexity of Medicare rules and decentralized administration.
- Recommendations include more centralized review and oversight by Medicare's central office.
- Enhanced reviewer training focused on complex cases is suggested to improve judgment consistency.