Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Strength of the cement-bone interface

W R Krause, W Krug, J Miller

    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
    |March 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study examined how different methods of applying acrylic bone cement affect the strength of the bond between the cement and cancellous bone. The researchers found that cleaned bone surfaces and low-viscosity cement result in the strongest interface. Unsurprisingly, uncleaned surfaces and doughy cement led to weaker bonds. The study also found that allowing cement to penetrate 5 to 10 mm into the bone maximizes strength. These findings could help improve joint implant surgery by guiding best practices for cement application and surface preparation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The importance of arginine 102 for the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase.

    Biochemical and biophysical research communications·1992
    Same author

    High-efficiency gene transfer into cardiac myocytes.

    Nucleic acids research·1992
    Same author

    Brain-derived neurotrophic factor augments rotational behavior and nigrostriatal dopamine turnover in vivo.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1992
    Same author

    Differentiated practice: a three-dimensional model.

    Nursing management·1992
    Same author

    Use of unlicensed assistive personnel in acute care settings.

    The Journal of nursing administration·1992
    Same author

    Effect of a human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor on human monocyte function.

    AIDS research and human retroviruses·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedic surgery techniques
    • Biomechanics of implant fixation
    • Tissue engineering in musculoskeletal systems

    Background:

    The mechanical stability of joint implants depends on the bond between acrylic cement and bone. While it is known that cement penetrates cancellous bone to form a mechanical interlock, the exact influence of surface preparation and cement consistency remains unclear. Prior research has shown that surface cleanliness and cement viscosity affect interface strength. However, no prior work had resolved how specific preparation methods impact tensile and shear strength. This gap motivated further investigation into how surface cleaning and cement application techniques influence bond strength. The uncertainty around optimal cement penetration distances also remains unresolved. Current methods vary widely in practice, leading to inconsistent outcomes. Understanding these variables could improve implant longevity and reduce complications. This paper addresses these uncertainties by examining the effects of preparation and cement properties on interface strength.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    Keywords:
    acrylic bone cementcement-bone interfacejoint implant fixationbiomechanics of implants

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The study found that cleaned cancellous bone surfaces and low-viscosity cement result in the strongest cement-bone interface.

    Cleaned surfaces using water lavage or a polyethylene brush significantly increase interface strength compared to uncleaned surfaces.

    The study found that cement penetration of 5 to 10 mm into cancellous bone maximizes interface strength.

    Low-viscosity cement allows better penetration into cancellous bone, leading to higher tensile and shear strength at the interface.

    Related Experiment Videos

    This study aimed to determine how cement application methods and bone surface preparation influence the strength of the cement-bone interface. The specific problem involves inconsistent fixation outcomes in joint implants. The motivation stems from the need to optimize cement application to improve long-term implant stability. The authors sought to compare different preparation techniques and cement viscosities. They focused on cancellous bone, which is commonly used in joint fixation. The study aimed to identify the optimal conditions for cement penetration and interface strength. By isolating variables like surface cleanliness and cement viscosity, the authors intended to clarify best practices. This work addresses a critical gap in understanding how preparation affects implant fixation.

    Main Methods:

    The study compared multiple cement application techniques and surface preparation methods. Cancellous bone samples were prepared using either high-intensity water lavage or a polyethylene brush. Some surfaces were left uncleaned for comparison. Cement was applied in two forms: doughy and low-viscosity. The cement was either finger-packed or allowed to penetrate the bone. Interface strength was measured using tensile and shear tests. The penetration depth was controlled to assess its effect on bond strength. The experimental setup allowed for precise comparison of preparation and cement types. The results were analyzed to determine which conditions yielded the highest strength.

    Main Results:

    The highest interface strength was observed when low-viscosity cement penetrated cleaned cancellous bone. Tensile and shear strengths were significantly lower when doughy cement was used on uncleaned surfaces. A cleaned surface achieved with water lavage or a polyethylene brush improved strength. Penetration distances of 5 to 10 mm maximized interface strength. These results suggest that surface preparation is critical for optimal cement fixation. Low-viscosity cement outperformed doughy cement in all tested conditions. The study found no significant difference between the two cleaning methods. The data supports the importance of both surface cleanliness and cement viscosity.

    Conclusions:

    The authors concluded that surface preparation and cement viscosity strongly influence the strength of the cement-bone interface. They emphasized that cleaned surfaces and low-viscosity cement are necessary for optimal fixation. The study found that penetration distances of 5 to 10 mm are most effective. These findings suggest that current clinical practices may benefit from standardized preparation techniques. The authors propose that these results could inform best practices in joint implant surgery. They caution that uncleaned surfaces and doughy cement significantly reduce interface strength. The study does not claim that these findings are essential for all implant types. The authors suggest that further research could explore other variables affecting interface strength.

    The study measured both tensile and shear strengths of the cement-bone interface using standardized testing methods.

    The findings suggest that standardized surface preparation and cement viscosity could improve implant fixation and reduce complications.