Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biological variability in maximum aerobic power

V L Katch, S S Sady, P Freedson

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

    Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2000
    Same author

    Improved psychological well-being, quality of life, and health practices in moderately overweight women participating in a 12-week structured weight loss program.

    Obesity research·1998
    Same author

    The effect of aerobic exercise on self-esteem and depressive and anxiety symptoms among breast cancer survivors.

    Oncology nursing forum·1998
    Same author

    Individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are in caloric balance despite losses in mass.

    Journal of the neurological sciences·1995
    Same author

    Validity of a new portable indirect calorimeter: the AeroSport TEEM 100.

    European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1995
    Same author

    Reduced short-term thermic effects of a meal in obese adolescent girls.

    European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1992

    Biological variation significantly impacts maximum aerobic power (VO2max) measurements, accounting for over 90% of the total variability. Technological error contributes less than 10%, highlighting the need for careful consideration of individual differences in exercise physiology research.

    Area of Science:

    • Exercise Physiology
    • Human Performance
    • Sports Science

    Background:

    • Maximum aerobic power (VO2max) is a key indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness.
    • Understanding variability in VO2max measurements is crucial for accurate assessment of training adaptations.
    • Previous studies have not fully delineated the contributions of biological versus technological factors to VO2max variability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To quantify the biological variation in VO2max within trained individuals.
    • To determine the proportion of variability attributable to technological error in VO2max testing.
    • To emphasize the importance of accounting for biological variability in exercise intervention studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Repeated VO2max treadmill tests were conducted on five trained subjects (four female, one male) over a 2-4 week period.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • An average of 8-20 tests per subject (80 total) were performed to ensure robust data.
  • Biological variation (Si) was calculated after subtracting technological error (Se), derived from equipment-specific trial standard deviations.

    • Main Results:

    • The combined technological and biological variation (Si + Se) in VO2max was +/- 5.6%.
    • Biological variability constituted 90% or more of the total observed variability in VO2max.
    • Technological error accounted for less than 10% of the total variability in VO2max measurements.

    Conclusions:

    • Biological variation is the predominant factor influencing VO2max measurements in trained individuals.
    • Technological error in VO2max testing is relatively small compared to inherent biological differences.
    • Control data accounting for individual biological variability is essential when evaluating training effects on VO2max.