Results of treating Hodgkin's disease without a policy of laparotomy staging

Results of the treatment of 780 primary patients with Hodgkin's disease at the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) between 1968 and 1977 are analyzed. Treatment decisions were based on the evaluation of the extent of disease by clinical methods. A marked improvement in relapse-free survival and overall survival was observed for 1973-1977 as compared to 1968-1972. This improvement did not result from differences in the distribution of important prognostic attributes (clinical stage, pathology, and age) between the two periods, and there was no improvement in our ability to rescue relapsed patients. Improved relapse-free and overall survival during the second period was observed for all stages in patients less than 50 years of age, but not in the older group. The improved survival of patients treated between 1973 and 1977 is attributed to more effective initial therapy, which reduced the fraction of patients who relapsed. These observations provide indirect evidence that relapse has a negative effect on prognosis, and that the initial treatment of patients with Hodgkin's disease should be designed to reduce the risk of relapse to a minimum without causing an unacceptable increase in late complications. The observed/expected incidence of acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the PMH series was increased to 41.9 and 13.9 respectively. The question of whether a policy of doing routine staging laparotomies improves the results of treatment of patients with Hodgkin's disease is considered only in general terms by comparing the total PMH series with the total Stanford Medical Center series of patients treated between 1968 and 1977. Relapse-free survival at 10 years is 48.9% and 66.8% respectively, at the two institutions, while overall survival at 10 years is identified.