Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating exposure-specific disease rates from case-control studies using Bayes' theorem

R R Neutra, M E Drolette

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |September 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Study of high- and low-current-configuration homes from the 1988 Denver Childhood Cancer Study.

    Bioelectromagnetics·2002
    Same author

    Electric and magnetic fields and cancer: case study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2001
    Same author

    California Department of Health Services Workshop on EMF epidemiology.

    Bioelectromagnetics·2001
    Same author

    A richer conceptualization of "exposure" for epidemiological studies of the "EMF mixture".

    Bioelectromagnetics·2001
    Same author

    A case-control pilot study of traffic exposures and early childhood leukemia using a geographic information system.

    Bioelectromagnetics·2001
    Same author

    Panel exploring pro and con arguments as to whether EMFs cause childhood brain cancer.

    Bioelectromagnetics·2001

    This study clarifies how different case-control study designs (incident vs. prevalent cases) impact exposure-odds ratio interpretation. It shows how to calculate disease rates without the rare disease assumption.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Case-control studies are crucial for investigating disease etiology.
    • Different subject selection methods can influence the interpretation of exposure-odds ratios.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To differentiate three types of case-control studies based on subject selection.
    • To clarify the relationship between exposure-odds ratios and rate ratios in each study type.
    • To present methods for calculating exposure-specific rates without the rare disease assumption.

    Main Methods:

    • Categorization of case-control studies into three types based on case and non-case selection.
    • Analysis of the mathematical equivalence between exposure-odds ratios and rate ratios under different study designs.
    • Application of Bayes' theorem for rate estimation.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Study type 1 (incident cases vs. representative non-cases) yields an exposure-odds ratio equivalent to the incidence density ratio without a rare disease assumption.
    • Study types 2 and 3 (incident cases vs. residual non-cases; prevalent cases vs. non-cases) yield exposure-odds ratios equivalent to cumulative incidence-odds ratios and prevalence odds ratios, respectively.
    • Exposure-specific rates can be estimated using Bayes' theorem, even without the rare disease assumption, when the overall disease rate is known.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of case-control study design significantly impacts the interpretation of exposure-odds ratios.
    • Accurate estimation of disease rates is achievable across different study designs, mitigating the need for the rare disease assumption.
    • Methods are provided for calculating approximate confidence limits for exposure-specific rates.