Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why we need better test evaluations

M H Zweig, E A Robertson

    Clinical Chemistry
    |June 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Evaluating laboratory tests requires prospective studies with representative patient populations. Sound study design ensures accurate clinical utility, preventing misleading results and guiding effective test selection for patient care.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Clinical notes on the influenza epidemic occurring in the Quebec garrison.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Decrease in the number of abdominal hysterectomies after introduction of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

    The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2000
    Same author

    Haemodynamic changes during laparoscopic anterior fundoplication measured by trans-oesophageal Doppler ultrasound.

    Anaesthesia·2000
    Same author

    Prevalence-value-accuracy plots: a new method for comparing diagnostic tests based on misclassification costs.

    Clinical chemistry·1999
    Same author

    Linear regression estimation of minimal detectable concentration. Thyrotropin as an example.

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1997
    Same author

    Focal vulvitis: a psychosexual problem for which surgery is not the answer.

    Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·1995
    Same journal

    Interlaboratory Comparison of a Glucagon and Oxyntomodulin Immuno-LC-MS/MS Assay: Implications for Diabetes Research.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    Same journal

    TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

    Clinical chemistry·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical laboratory science
    • Medical research methodology
    • Health services research

    Background:

    • Clinical utility of laboratory tests is paramount for patient management.
    • Many published evaluations of laboratory tests suffer from flawed study designs, leading to unreliable conclusions.
    • Overlooked principles of study design compromise the validity of test evaluations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight common design flaws in laboratory test evaluations.
    • To propose best practices for the clinical evaluation of laboratory tests.
    • To ensure that laboratory test evaluations yield valid and clinically useful information.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of recent literature to identify common errors in test evaluation studies.
    • Recommendation for prospective study designs using representative patient populations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on clearly defining the clinical question and using independent assessment methods.
  • Guidance on selecting decision levels for comparative test evaluations to ensure consistent sensitivity or specificity.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified significant shortcomings in the design of numerous published laboratory test evaluations.
    • Demonstrated how overlooked design principles lead to misleading or uncertain validity of test results.
    • Provided examples from recent literature illustrating these design deficiencies.

    Conclusions:

    • Prospective studies with representative patient populations are essential for valid laboratory test evaluation.
    • Adherence to sound study protocols ensures the generation of reliable data for selecting effective clinical tests.
    • Improved study design is critical for enhancing the clinical utility and trustworthiness of laboratory diagnostics.