Related Experiment Videos
Predicting hearing sensitivity and audiometric slope for mentally retarded persons
Ear and Hearing
|March 1, 1982
Summary
The sensitivity prediction from the acoustic reflex (SPAR) test accurately predicted hearing levels in 58% of subjects with mental retardation. This audiology tool shows promise for assessing hearing in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Assessing hearing sensitivity in individuals with mental retardation presents unique challenges.
- Traditional audiological tests may be difficult to administer or unreliable in this population.
- The acoustic reflex is a physiological response that can be measured objectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the sensitivity prediction from the acoustic reflex (SPAR) test in predicting hearing sensitivity levels in subjects with mental retardation.
- To determine the test's utility as an audiological tool for this specific population.
Main Methods:
- The SPAR test was administered to 90 subjects classified by four levels of mental retardation and five levels of hearing sensitivity.
- Accuracy of hearing level prediction and audiometric slope prediction was analyzed.
- Results were compared to previous findings in non-retarded populations.
Main Results:
- SPAR accurately predicted hearing levels for 58% of subjects, with 29% showing one-category errors and 13% showing two- or three-category errors.
- Audiometric slope predictions were also accurate for 58% of subjects.
- Increased hearing loss correlated with a decreased likelihood of predicting normal hearing.
Conclusions:
- The SPAR test demonstrates considerable accuracy in predicting hearing levels and audiometric slopes in individuals with mental retardation.
- While slightly less accurate than in non-retarded individuals, SPAR remains a valuable tool for audiological assessment in this population.
- SPAR is recommended for audiologists, especially for testing individuals with intellectual disabilities who are difficult to assess through conventional methods.