Modification of the Smeloff mitral prosthesis

The simplicity of the ball valve with its random seating capabilities coupled with its durability, reliability, and predictability has made it the attractive choice of many surgeons. A low incidence of embolic phenomena with the Smeloff full-orifice, double-caged, bare-strutted ball valve has made us reluctant to alter the design over 17 years. Recent evaluation of the reasons for reoperation on the Smeloff mitral valve implantation in 376 cases revealed 16 cases in which development of fibrous subvalvular pannus with signs and symptoms of mitral stenosis occurred. The mean occurrence time was 7.5 years for adults and 4.6 years for children under age 8 years. No such problem has been encountered with the valve in the aortic position. Many of these patients are maintained on aspirin and Persantine alone. Valve design was explored as a possible cause of mitral subvalvular stenosis. Alterations of the design were examined in the engineering laboratory and in dog implantations by catheterization, electrophysiologic evaluation, and echocardiography. The results were encouraging.