Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lateralization of bone-conducted sounds

A F Jahn, J Tonndorf

    American Journal of Otolaryngology
    |March 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Bone-conducted sound localization relies on timing and intensity cues. Pure-tone localization improved with phase differences, revealing mechanical interference in the cochlea.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Decompensated labyrinthine weakness presenting as de novo peripheral vertigo: a discrete clinical entity?

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2018
    Same author

    Benign positional vertigo and endolymphatic hydrops: what is the connection?

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2017
    Same author

    Dimensional analysis of cochlear models.

    Project report. USAF School of Aviation Medicine·2014
    Same author

    Beats in cochlear models.

    Project report. USAF School of Aviation Medicine·2014
    Same author

    Shearing motion in scala media of cochlear models.

    Project report. USAF School of Aviation Medicine·2014
    Same author

    The transfer of energy across the cochlea.

    Project report. USAF School of Aviation Medicine·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Biophysics

    Background:

    • Bone-conducted sound (BCS) lateralization is crucial for auditory perception.
    • Understanding BCS localization mechanisms informs hearing aid technology and auditory rehabilitation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the factors influencing the lateralization of bilaterally applied bone-conducted signals.
    • To determine the role of temporal (delta t), intensity (delta I), and phase (delta phi) differences in BCS localization.
    • To explore the underlying mechanisms, including mechanical interference and neural interactions.

    Main Methods:

    • Subjects performed localization tasks using various bone-conducted signals (clicks, tone pips, pure tones).
    • Stimuli varied in rise time, temporal differences (delta t), intensity differences (delta I), and phase differences (delta phi).
    • Tactile input and potential neural interactions (mutual masking) were considered.

    Main Results:

    • Localization was accurate with clicks and short-rise-time tone pips.
    • Localization accuracy deteriorated with longer rise times (>1 msec), highlighting wavefront steepness importance.
    • Continuous pure-tone localization improved with training, aided by phase differences (delta phi) and intensity differences (delta I).
    • Observed loudness increments were attributed to mechanical interference between ipsilateral and contralateral signals at the cochlea.
    • Minimal neural interaction (mutual masking) was detected for short-duration signals near zero temporal difference.
    • Tactile input did not significantly contribute to lateralization.

    Conclusions:

    • The steepness of the signal wavefront is critical for BCS localization.
    • Phase differences (delta phi) significantly aid pure-tone BCS localization, mediated by mechanical cochlear interference.
    • Intensity differences (delta I) also contribute to pure-tone BCS localization.
    • Mechanical interference is a primary mechanism for BCS lateralization, distinct from air-conducted sound localization.

    Related Experiment Videos