Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statistics

I M Chang, R Gelman, M Pagano

    Journal of Chronic Diseases
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Seawater mercury species and phytoplankton biomass drive bioaccumulation in a coastal plankton food web.

    Chemosphere·2026
    Same author

    Understanding the reach of an evidence-based public health intervention to optimise nutrition and movement behaviour at scale: The INFANT Program.

    Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2025
    Same author

    Locally advanced NSCLC: overview of real-world pattern of recurrence in durvalumab era (LEOPARD trial).

    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
    Same author

    Receiver design for the REACH global 21-cm signal experiment.

    Experimental astronomy·2025
    Same author

    Water column distribution of zooplanktonic size classes derived from in-situ plankton profilers: Potential use to contextualize contaminant loads in plankton.

    Marine pollution bulletin·2023
    Same author

    Clinical profile and outcome of cardiomyopathies in infants and children seen at a tertiary centre.

    International journal of cardiology·2022
    Same journal

    LEPROMATOUS LEPROSY AND AUSTRALIA ANTIGEN WITH COMMENTS ON THE GENETICS OF LEPROSY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN AN ADULT DIABETIC POPULATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    ESSENTIAL TRACE METALS IN MAN: MOLYBDENUM.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    DISTINGUISHING PHYSIOLOGIC VARIATION FROM ANALYTIC VARIATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    AORTITIS SYNDROME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS CLINICAL PICTURE AND ETIOLOGY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    See all related articles

    This study introduces a new method for standardizing data in clinical trials, correcting for patient mix differences. This improves the accuracy of multivariate analyses and population behavior predictions.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Methodology
    • Epidemiology

    Background:

    • Distribution function estimators can be distorted by covariate imbalances in different treatment groups.
    • Standardization is crucial for accurate multivariate analysis, population behavior prediction, and comparing trials with varying patient demographics.
    • Despite its importance, standardization is underutilized in clinical trials due to complexity with multiple covariates.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a novel method for correcting distribution function estimators.
    • To address distortions in the joint distribution of covariates within subsamples of clinical trials.
    • To facilitate accurate multivariate analyses and population behavior predictions in the presence of treatment-induced covariate imbalances.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The proposed method corrects for distortions in the joint distribution of covariates.
    • It standardizes estimators across subsamples receiving different treatments.
    • The approach is applicable to a wide range of statistical analyses.

    Main Results:

    • The method effectively corrects for covariate distribution distortions.
    • It enhances the utility of standardization in clinical trials.
    • The technique simplifies complex standardization procedures involving multiple covariates.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented method overcomes the complexities of covariate standardization in clinical trials.
    • This facilitates more reliable multivariate analyses and accurate population behavior predictions.
    • The approach is valuable for comparing trials and adjusting for known patient characteristic imbalances.