Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low spatial-frequency channels in human vision: adaptation and masking

C F Stromeyer, S Klein, B M Dawson

    Vision Research
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study challenges the idea that the visual system cannot adapt to very low spatial frequencies. Researchers found that adapting to low spatial frequencies (0.12-1.0 cycles/degree) maximally affects detection at the same frequency, suggesting dedicated visual channels.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Stroke-blind for colors, faces and locations: Partial recovery after three years.

    Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2012
    Same author

    Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2005
    Same author

    Temporal asymmetry in motion masking: a shortening of the temporal impulse response function.

    Vision research·2003
    Same author

    Human temporal impulse response speeds up with increased stimulus contrast.

    Vision research·2003
    Same author

    Filling-in of the foveal blue scotoma.

    Vision research·2001
    Same author

    Texture fading correlates with stimulus salience.

    Vision research·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Visual neuroscience
    • Perception science

    Background:

    • Previous research suggested limited adaptability of visual channels below 1.5 cycles/degree (c/deg).
    • It was hypothesized that no adaptable spatial-frequency channels exist for very low spatial frequencies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the adaptability of visual mechanisms at very low spatial frequencies (0.12-1.0 c/deg).
    • To determine if adaptation and masking effects are frequency-specific at low spatial frequencies.
    • To examine the selectivity of these low spatial frequency mechanisms for phase, orientation, and motion.

    Main Methods:

    • Employing adaptation and masking paradigms with low spatial frequency gratings (0.12-1.0 c/deg).
    • Utilizing test patterns with gradual or sharp onset/offset.
    • Assessing threshold elevations at various spatial frequencies and orientations.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Adaptation and masking at low spatial frequencies (0.12-1.0 c/deg) caused maximal threshold elevations at the same spatial frequency.
    • Adaptation selectivity for position (phase) and orientation was observed at low spatial frequencies.
    • Masking demonstrated orientation selectivity as low as 0.2 c/deg.
    • These findings contradict the notion of non-adaptable low spatial frequency channels.

    Conclusions:

    • The visual system possesses form mechanisms optimally sensitive to very low spatial frequencies.
    • The dichotomy between transient motion and sustained form channels may be an oversimplification at low spatial and temporal frequencies.
    • Directionally-selective motion mechanisms sensitive to slow motion might contribute to form discrimination.