Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gentamicin dosing errors with four commonly used nomograms

T S Lesar, J C Rotschafer, L M Strand

    JAMA
    |September 10, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Epoetin in the 'untransfusable' anaemic patient: a retrospective case series and systematic analysis of literature case reports.

    Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2014
    Same author

    Plasmid-mediated complementation of gyrA and gyrB in fluoroquinolone-resistant Bacteroides fragilis.

    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2003
    Same author

    Antiretroviral medication errors for patients with HIV infection.

    The AIDS reader·2003
    Same author

    In vitro pharmacodynamic analysis of single daily dosing versus conventional dosing of gentamicin administered with penicillin against Enterococcus faecalis.

    Pharmacotherapy·2002
    Same author

    Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin and levofloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2001
    Same author

    What do we really know about antibiotic pharmacodynamics?

    Pharmacotherapy·2001
    Same journal

    Deescalation, Discontinuation, and Deimplementation Trials: Evaluating Whether and How to Do Less.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for GERD.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    The Psychedelic Therapies Executive Order: On Approval and Clinical Readiness.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    "Suturing": Love, Death, and Perfection's Limits.

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    What Is Low Back Pain?

    JAMA·2026
    Same journal

    From Silicon Valley to the Vatican-The Expanding Debate on AI Ethics.

    JAMA·2026
    See all related articles

    Predictive gentamicin sulfate dosing methods often lead to subtherapeutic or toxic levels. Individualized dosing achieved better therapeutic concentrations, highlighting the need for serum monitoring and adjustments with predictive methods.

    Area of Science:

    • Pharmacology
    • Clinical Pharmacy
    • Drug Dosing

    Background:

    • Gentamicin sulfate is a critical antibiotic requiring precise dosing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity.
    • Traditional predictive dosing methods may not consistently achieve optimal therapeutic gentamicin concentrations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the accuracy of four predictive gentamicin sulfate dosing methods against an individualized pharmacokinetic approach.
    • To compare the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic serum concentrations with each method.

    Main Methods:

    • Pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin were determined from serum concentration-time data in 96 patients.
    • Four predictive dosing methods (Sarubbi-Hull, Dettli, rule of eights, Chan) were compared to an individualized method.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Serum gentamicin concentrations were calculated based on doses derived from each method.

    • Main Results:

    • Predictive dosing methods frequently resulted in subtherapeutic or potentially toxic gentamicin serum concentrations.
    • The Dettli and Chan methods were superior to Sarubbi-Hull and rule of eights in achieving therapeutic concentrations.
    • Individualized dosing regimens significantly improved the attainment of desired therapeutic gentamicin concentrations compared to predictive methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Predictive gentamicin sulfate dosing methods demonstrate limitations in achieving consistent therapeutic concentrations.
    • Individualized pharmacokinetic dosing is superior for optimizing gentamicin therapy.
    • Serum concentration monitoring and dose adjustments are essential when utilizing predictive dosing strategies.